Screen 1,000 papers in 30 minutes
Three AIs. Smarter triage. Stronger systematic reviews.
Evidence-based title/abstract screening with three independent AI reviewers. Borderline calls are surfaced for your judgement, not silently discarded — so your review keeps the papers that matter.
No credit card required
Three AIs · One audit trail · PRISMA-aligned
Why single-AI tools fail systematic reviews
Wrong exclusions
Single AI makes silent errors. Papers vanish unseen.
Black box reasoning
Decisions without quotable evidence. Researchers can't audit.
No second opinion
One AI, one perspective. No consensus, no confidence.
TriSift solves all three.
Triple-AI review in one screen
Three independent models. Different training corpora. Real consensus, not echo chamber.
See exactly why every paper was included or excluded
Every decision shows the exact quote.
No black box. No fabricated reasoning. Every reviewer must cite the specific text from the title, abstract, or affiliations supporting its call — and the hallucination validator flags any quote that can't be matched to the source.
Why TriSift
| Feature | TriSift | Rayyan | Covidence | Manual |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI reviewers | 3 | 1 | 0–1 | 0 |
| Quotable evidence | ✅ | ⚠️ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Borderline flagging | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ | ✅ |
| Cost (1,000 papers) | $35 | $0–$425/yr | $325–$650/yr | Hours |
| PRISMA export | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | Manual |
| Setup time | 5 min | 30 min | 1 hour | N/A |
- AI reviewers
- 3
- Quotable evidence
- ✅
- Borderline flagging
- ✅
- Cost (1,000 papers)
- $35
- PRISMA export
- ✅
- Setup time
- 5 min
- AI reviewers
- 1
- Quotable evidence
- ⚠️
- Borderline flagging
- ❌
- Cost (1,000 papers)
- $0–$425/yr
- PRISMA export
- ✅
- Setup time
- 30 min
- AI reviewers
- 0–1
- Quotable evidence
- ❌
- Borderline flagging
- ❌
- Cost (1,000 papers)
- $325–$650/yr
- PRISMA export
- ✅
- Setup time
- 1 hour
- AI reviewers
- 0
- Quotable evidence
- ✅
- Borderline flagging
- ✅
- Cost (1,000 papers)
- Hours
- PRISMA export
- Manual
- Setup time
- N/A
Comparison data current as of 2026. Competitor pricing from public websites. Cochrane methodology compliance verified by both Rayyan and Covidence; TriSift uses identical methodology with multi-AI consensus.
Pay only for what you screen. No subscriptions.
Every plan includes: All 3 AIs · PRISMA export · NEEDS_REVIEW resolution · Audit trail
Frequently asked questions
How accurate is TriSift?
TriSift is designed to mirror Cochrane and PRISMA two-reviewer methodology using three independent AI models with conflict resolution by a methodology judge. Every decision is logged with model, prompt, and timestamp, and inter-rater reliability (Cohen's κ) is computed automatically. Researchers retain final authority and should verify borderline calls.
Which databases are supported?
TriSift accepts standard CSV and RIS format exports from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, and directly from tools like Rayyan or Covidence.
Can I use TriSift for Cochrane reviews?
Yes. TriSift's independent multiple-reviewer structure is designed specifically to comply with PRISMA and Cochrane Handbook standards for dual systematic screening.
Is my data secure?
We do not use your papers or custom criteria to train models. Data is processed ephemerally using strict enterprise APIs and stored securely in our encrypted database only for your access.
Do credits expire?
No. The credits you purchase do not expire. You can buy a large pack and use it across multiple different systematic reviews over several years.
More questions? See our methodology page.
Screen your first 10 papers free
Start nowThen $5 for 100 papers. No subscription.